The Supreme Court docket shocked nearly everybody when conservative justices John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh sided with their progressive colleagues to rule that Alabama’s lately redrawn congressional maps discriminated in opposition to Black voters.
Writer David Daley, a senior fellow of voting rights advocacy group FairVote, advised The New Irregular’s Danielle Moodie what makes the choice all of the extra extraordinary is that Chief Justice Roberts has made “his life’s work to try to intestine the Voting Rights Act” for greater than 35 years.
Subscribe to The New Irregular on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Stitcher, Amazon Music, or Overcast.
“The chief justice fairly properly might have checked out this as a reasonably straightforward bone to throw,” he stated. “He’s additionally very conscious of the courtroom’s institutional issues and the courtroom’s moral issues and the very low standing with which the American public at the moment view this courtroom.”
He stated whereas the Alabama choice is certainly a win for democracy, it is going to be attention-grabbing to see if it shapes the courtroom’s view on future selections.
“It’s actually, actually vital as you do to view this choice as excellent news, however to view it… within the context of a courtroom that for a decade has been actually radically shrinking these protections,” Daley stated. “They might have stated, properly, not a lot goes to be misplaced right here as a result of in the event you do the mathematics on this even when Democrats are in a position to win again a seat in Alabama, a seat in Georgia, a seat in Louisiana, and two seats in Texas, Republicans may have been in a position to achieve maybe extra seats than that merely by means of the mid-decade redistricting that they are gonna pull off in North Carolina and Ohio the place they are going to be doing a very radical mid decade partisan gerrymanders.”
Take heed to this full episode of The New Irregular on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon and Stitcher.